Factores que influyen en la produccio?n cienti?fica de los docentes universitarios: una revisio?n sistema?tica
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21803/pensam.v11i21-1.276Keywords:
Training, teaching, researchersAbstract
Abstract
This article presents a bibliographical review of empirical studies of the factors influencing the scientific production of professors, with the objective of characterizing scientific production in the university and its determining factors. It was carried out through the analysis of articles that present the situation of institutions of higher education. To find these articles, search strings were used in various databases, including Scopus, Scielo, Taylor and Francis, and inclusive and exclusive terms were used to delimit the articles found. An analysis is provided of the factors influencing scientific production, based on type of institution training and professional development, as indicators of their essential characteristics.
Keywords: Training, teaching, researchers.
Resumen
Este arti?culo presenta una revisio?n bibliogra?fica de los estudios empi?ricos de los factores que influyen en la produccio?n cienti?fica de los profesores, con el objetivo de caracterizar la produccio?n cienti?fica en la universidad y sus factores determinantes. Se llevo? a cabo a trave?s del ana?lisis de arti?culos que presentan la situacio?n de las instituciones de educacio?n superior. Para encontrar estos arti?culos, se utilizaron banco de datos, incluidos Scopus, Scielo, Taylor y Francis, y se utilizaron te?rminos inclusivos y exclusivos para delimitar los arti?culos encontrados. Se proporciona un ana?lisis de los factores que influyen en la produccio?n cienti?fica, segu?n el tipo de capacitacio?n de la institucio?n y el desarrollo profesional, como indicadores de sus caracteri?sticas esenciales.
Palabras clave: educacio?n,educar,investigadores
Resumo
Este artigo apresenta uma revisa?o bibliogra?fica de estudos empi?ricos dos fatores que influenciam a produc?a?o cienti?fica dos docentes, com o objetivo de caracterizar a produc?a?o cienti?fica na universidade e seus fatores determinantes. A pesquisa foi feita atrave?s de ana?lises dos artigos que apresentam a situac?a?o das instituic?o?es de educac?a?o superior. Para encontrar estes artigos, foram usadas base de dados incluindo Scopus, Scielo, Taylor e Francis, termos inclusivos e exclusivos foram utilizados para delimitar os artigos encontrados. Foi providenciado uma ana?lise dos fatores que influenciam a produc?a?o cienti?fica, baseado no tipo de treinamento da instituic?a?o e desenvolvimento profissional, como indicadores de suas caracteri?sticas essenciais.
Palavras-chave: educac?a?o, lecionar, pesquisadores
Downloads
References
Buela-Casal, G. (2006). Situación actual de la productividad científica de las universidades españolas. International Journal og Clinical and Health Psychology, 175-190.
Barner, J., Holosko, M. & King, T. (2015). Research Productivity in Top-Ranked Schools in Psychology and Social Work: Does Having a Research Culture Matter? 5-18.
Galbraith, Q., Smart, E., Smith, S. & Reed, M. (2014). Who Publishes in Top-Tier Library Science Journals? College & Research Libraries, 724-735.
Runyan, C., Finnegan, R., Gonzalez-Padron, C. & Line, N. (2016). What drives publishing productivity for pre-tenure marketing faculty: insights using the lens of resource advantage theory. Marketing Education Review. 23(2). 105-119.
Don Houston (2015) Quality in postgraduate research, Quality in Higher Education. 21(1). 1-6, DOI: 10.1080/13538322.2015.1049440
Codina-Canet, M., Gómez, C. O. & Rodríguez, A. P. (2013). Análisis de la producción científica y de la especialización temática de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 1-17.
García-Cepero, M. (2010). El estudio de productividad académica de profesores universitarios a través de análisis factorial confirmatorio: el caso de psicología en Estados Unidos de América. Universitas Phychologica. 9(1). 13-26.
Gomes dos Reis, L. & Horvath, J. (2014). Uma análise sobre a produção acadêmica dos docentes das universidades estaduais paranaenses de 2008 a 2012. Revista GUAL, 22-42.
Laurent, J. & Runia, E. (2016). Scholarly Productivity of School Psychology Faculty Members in Specialist-Level Programs. 48th Annual Convention of the National Association of School. 1-35. New Orleans, LA: Psychologisst, New Orleans, LA.
Leech, N., Haug, C., Iceman-Sands, D. & Moriarty, J. (2014). Change in classification level and the effects on research productivity and merit scores for faculty in school of education. Studies in Higher Education, 1030-1045.
Miroiu, A., Păunescu, M., & Vîiu, G. A. (2015). Ranking Romanian academic departments in three fields of study using the g-index. Quality in Higher Education, 21(2), 189-212.
Narvaez, J. & Burgos, J. (2011). La productividad investigativa del docente universitario. Revista Científica Electrónica de Ciencias Humanas/ Scientific e-journal of Human Sciences, 116-140.
Palacios, M., & Martin, G. (2016). La producción científica en la Facultad de Lenguas de la Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Cinta de moebio, 214-230.
Perozo, S., Arteaga, F. & Fuenmayor, B. (2008). La productividad investigativa de los docentes del instituto universitario de tecnología de Cabimas. Revista NEGO- TIUM, 72-87.
Pirela de Faria, L. & de Alizo, L. P. (2006). Perfil de competencias del docente en la función de investigador y su relación con la producción intelectual. opción, 22(50), 159-177.
ShanghaiRanking Consultancy. (23 de junio de 2009). Academic Ranking of World Universities. Obtenido de Academic Ranking: http://www.shanghairanking.com/aboutus.html
Tenorio, L., do Amaral, M. & de Paiva, A. (2014). Producción Científica en el área de educación física en Brasil: Análisis de la producción de los maestros en las instituciones de formación en los estados de Paraíba y Pernambuco. PraxisySaber, 141-150.
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. (2008). Vocabulario Controlado (tercera ed.). Mexico D.F.: ISSUE.
Zoellner, K., Hines, S., Keenan, T. & Samson, S. (2015). Faculty Research and Publication Practices. 111-131.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Pensamiento Americano
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0b52d/0b52d46edc111e449a0fbf055f579b35f69999ca" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The author or authors of an article accepted for publication in the Journal Pensamiento Americano will transfer all of the patrimonial rights to the American University Corporation free of charge, within which are included: the right to edit, publish, reproduce and distribute both print media as digital, in addition to include in article in international indexes and / or databases, likewise, the Editorial Seal is authorized to use the images, tables and / or any graphic material presented in the article for the design of covers or posters from the same magazine. By assuming the patrimonial rights of the article, it may not be partially or totally reproduced in any printed or digital media without its express permission.
AUTHORITY ASPECTS
For the Pensamiento Americano Journal, all the authors of an article have made substantial contributions to the research and the manuscript, and they share the responsibility when the article presents errors, fraud in some way or violations of copyright.
After submitting an article, the journal does not accept the addition, deletion or change in the order of the authors, in addition we reserve the right to release the article when it has been submitted to the journal and under no circumstances will American Thought accept the article. withdrawal of an article during any phase of the editorial process