El Experimento del Ministro de la Justicia de Portugal con la Troika: Disipación de dudas sobre el suceso, continuación y confirmación de los resultados positivos
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21803/pensam.v12i24.309Keywords:
Troika, Memorandum of Understanding, Portuguese Ministry of Justice, Civil Enforcement Actions, Evaluation of Public PoliciesAbstract
Abstract
This article is the continuation of a series of studies on the impact of the measures implemented by the Portuguese Ministry of Justice. This research addresses the results obtained in the civil enforcement actions arising from objectives included in the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) signed between Portugal and the so-called Troika (International Monetary Fund / European Commission / European Central Bank). The empirical study was extended to cover the quantitative analysis of the results achieved not only during the Troika period but also during the post-Troika period. The results show and confirm a continued positive effect on the level of civil enforcement actions in the period analyzed.
Keywords: Troika, Memorandum of Understanding, Portuguese Ministry of Justice, Civil Enforcement Actions, Evaluation of Public Policies.
Resumen
Este arti?culo es la continuidad de una serie de estudios sobre el impacto de las medidas implementadas por el Ministro de la Justicia Portuguesa. Esta investigacio?n se acerca a los resultados obtenidos en las medidas de ejecucio?n que salieron a la luz de los objetivos incluidos en el Memora?ndum de Entendimiento (MoU) firmado entre Portugal y la llamada Troika (Fondo Monetario Internacional/Comisio?n Europea/Banco Central Europeo). El estudio empi?rico fue ampliado para cubrir los ana?lisis cuantitativos de los resultados obtenidos no solamente durante la Troika, pero en el periodo post-Troika. Los resultados confirman la continuacio?n del efecto positivo en el nivel de las acciones de las medidas de ejecucio?n en el periodo analizado.
Palabras Clave: Troika, Memora?ndum de Entendimiento, Ministro de la Justicia Portuguesa, Civil, Medidas de Ejecucio?n, Evaluacio?n de poli?ticas pu?blicas.
Resumo
Este artigo e? a continuac?a?o de uma se?rie de estudos sobre o impacto das medidas implementadas pelo Ministro da Justic?a Portuguesa. Esta pesquisa caminha em direc?a?o aos resultados obtidos nas medidas de execuc?a?o que surgiram dos objetivos inclui?dos no Memorando de Entendimento (Acordo) (MoU) assinado entre Portugal e a chamada Troika (Fundo Moneta?rio Internacional/Comissa?o Europeia/ Banco Central Europeu). O estudo empi?rico foi ampliado para cobrir as ana?lises quantitativas dos resultados obtidos na?o somente durante a Troika, mas tambe?m no peri?odo po?s-Troika. Os resultados confirmam a continuidade do efeito positivo no ni?vel das ac?o?es das medidas de execuc?a?o no peri?odo analisado.
Palavras-chave: Troika, Memorando de Entendimento (Acordo), Ministro da Justic?a Portuguesa, Civil, Medidas de Execuc?a?o, Avaliac?a?o de poli?ticas pu?blicas.
Downloads
References
Ambach, P., & Rackwitz, K. (2013). A Model of International Judicial Administration? The Evolution of Managerial Practices at the International Criminal Court. Law and Contemporary Problems, 76 (3-4), 119-161. Retrieved from: https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4373&context=lcp
Barnard, C. (1971). The Functions of the Executive: 30th Anniversary Edition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Bell, J. (2006). Judiciaries within Europe: A Comparative Review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Campbell, D. (2013). The Sky is Falling (Again): Evaluating the Current Crisis in the Judiciary. New England Law Review, 47, 571-603. Retrieved from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_ id=2515994
Catarino, J., & Correia, P. (2016). Receitas Fiscais e Tributação Geral sobre o Consumo em Portugal: Um Estudo sobre Eventuais Assimetrias do Comporta- mento dos Sujeitos Passivos do Imposto no Final da Primeira Década do Século XXI. Revista da FAE, 19 (1), 6-17. Retrieved from:
Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (2016). European Judicial Systems – Edition 2016 (2014 data): Efficiency and Quality of Justice. Retrieved from Conselho da Europa:
https://www.coe.int/t/dghl/cooperation/cepej/evaluation/2016/publication/REV1/2016_1%20%20CEPEJ%20Study%2023%20 51-%20General%20report%20-%20EN.pdf
Correia, P. M., & Catarino, J. (2016). Ingreso Bruto Tributable del IVA: Evidencia de Diferenciación de los Municipios de la Costa Portuguesa. Revista del CLAD Reforma y Democracia, 64, 225-246. Retrieved from: http://old.clad.org/portal/publicaciones-del-clad/revistacladreformademocracia/articulos/064febrero2016/grossrevenuefor-vat-tax-evidence-of-differentiation-at-the-portuguese-littoral-municipalities
Correia, P. M., & Jesus, I. (2016). Combate às Transferências Bancárias Ilegítimas pela Internet no Direito Português: Entre as Experiências Domésticas e Políticas Globais Concertadas. Revista Direito GV, 12 (2), 542-563. doi: 10.1590/2317-6172201622
Correia, P. M., & Videira, S. (2015). Troika’s Portuguese Ministry of Justice Experiment: An Empirical Study on the Success Story of the Civil Enforcement Actions. International Journal for Court Administration, 7 (1), 37-50. doi: 10.18352/ijca.180
Correia, P. M., & Videira, S. (2016). Troika’s Portuguese Ministry of Justice Experiment, Part II: Continued Positive Results for Civil Enforcement Actions in Troika's Aftermath. International Journal for Court Administration, 8 (1), 20-31. doi: 10.18352/ijca.215
Correia, P. M., Carrapato, P., & Bilhim, J. (2016). Administração Hospitalar em Portugal: Relação entre Antiguidade e Envolvimento Laboral, e Implicações para o Risco de Saída. Jornal Brasileiro de Economia da Saúde, 8 (2), 73-79. doi: 10.21115/JBES
Correia, P. M., Pinto, R., Garcia, B., & Dias, M. (2015). Teoria Institucional e o Poder dos Dirigentes dos Hospitais em Portugal, Parte III: Comparação com Outros Setores de Atividade. Jornal Brasileiro de Economia da Saúde, 7(3), 135-141. Retrieved f rom: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309410556_Teoria_Institucional_e_o_Poder_dos_Dirigentes_dos_Hospitais_em_Potugal_Parte_III_Comparacao_com_Outros_Setores_de_Atividade
Correia, P. M. A. R., Dias, M. T. V. C., Gonçalves, D. L., Novais, Z. D. J., & Pereira, S. P. M. (2018). Processos especiais de revitalização: mais um contributo empírico sobre os resultados da experiência da Troika no Ministério da Justiça português. Lex Humana, 10(1), 123-146.
Correia, P. M., & Dias, M. T. (2018). O poder detido pelos dirigentes máximos das organizações: evidências estatísticas de homogeneidade ao nível das perceções, em função da idade e antiguidade dos trabalhadores, em Portugal. Pensamiento Americano, 11(20), 80-92. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21803%2Fpenamer.11.20.497
Direção-Geral da Política de Justiça. (2016). Estatísticas da Justiça – Alguns Indicadores Estatísticos Sobre os Processos nos Tribunais Judiciais de 1a Instância, 2007-2015. Retrieved f rom Ministério da Justiça, Portugal: http://www.dgpj.mj.pt/sections/siej_pt/destaques4485/sections/siej_pt/destaques4485/algunsindicadores_2/downloadFile/file/Resultados%20 2015_20161028.pdf?nocache=1477659998.74
Direção-Geral da Política de Justiça. (2017). Estatísticas Trimestrais Sobre Ações Executivas Cíveis (2007- 2017) – Trimestre 2. Retrieved from Ministério da Justiça, Portugal:
Frederickson, H., Smith, K., Larimer, C., & Licari, M. (2012). The Public Administration Theory Primer. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
Gomes, C. (2007). The Transformation of the Portuguese Judicial Organization: Between Efficiency and Democracy. Utrecht Law Review, 3 (1), 101-111. Retrieved from:
https://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/abstract/10.18352/ulr.39/
Guimarães, T., Correia, P., Bilhim, J., & Akutsu, L. (2015). Governança em Tribunais de Justiça de Portugal: Adaptação e Validação de Escala de Medida. Ciências e Políticas Públicas, 1 (1): 25-46. Retrieved from: http://capp.iscsp.ulisboa.pt/images/Ejournal/
Troika's Portuguese Ministry of Justice Experiment: Dissipation of Doubts about Success, Continuation and Confirmation of Positive Results CPP%20Journal%20CAPP%20v1%20n1.pdf
Hayek, F. (1973). Law, Legislation and Liberty – Volume I: Rules and Order. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Hayek, F. (1978). Law, Legislation and Liberty – Volume II: The Mirage of Social Justice. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Hayek, F. (1979). Law, Legislation and Liberty – Volume III: The Political Order of a Free People. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Hill, M., & Hupe, P. (2014). Implementing Public Policy. London: Sage.
Kruskal, W., & Wallis, W. (1952). Use of Ranks in One-Criterion Variance Analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 47 (260), 583-621. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1952.10483441.
Lane, J. (2000). New Public Management. London: Routledge.
Langbroek, P. (2008). Entre Responsabilisation et Indépendance des Magistrats: La Réorganisation du Système Judiciaire des Pays-Bas. Revue Française D’administration Publique, 125, 67-79. doi: 10.3917/rfap.125.0067
Madureira, C. (2015). A reforma da Administração Pública Central no Portugal democrático: do período pórevolucionário à intervenção da troika. Revis- ta de Administração Pública, 49(3), 547-562. doi:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7612129503
vPortugal. (2011). Memorandum of Understanding on Specific Economic Policy Conditionality. Retrieved from: http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/eu_borrower/mou/2011-05-18-mou-portugal_en.pdf
Rocha, F. & Stoleroff, A. (2014). The challenges of the crisis and the external intervention in Portugal. In Fundación 1o de Mayo (Ed.), The New EU Economic
Governance and its Impact on the National Collective Bargaining Systems (pp. 151-173). Madrid: Fundación 1o de Mayo.
Stephenson, M. (2004). Court of Public Opinion: Government Accountability and Judicial Independence. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 20 (2), 379-399. doi: 10.1093/jleo/ewh038
Walsh, B. (2008). Judicial Productivity in India. International Journal for Court Administration, 1 (1), 23-30. doi: 10.18352/ijca.123
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2019-07-20 (2)
- 2019-07-16 (1)
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Pensamiento Americano
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The author or authors of an article accepted for publication in the Journal Pensamiento Americano will transfer all of the patrimonial rights to the American University Corporation free of charge, within which are included: the right to edit, publish, reproduce and distribute both print media as digital, in addition to include in article in international indexes and / or databases, likewise, the Editorial Seal is authorized to use the images, tables and / or any graphic material presented in the article for the design of covers or posters from the same magazine. By assuming the patrimonial rights of the article, it may not be partially or totally reproduced in any printed or digital media without its express permission.
AUTHORITY ASPECTS
For the Pensamiento Americano Journal, all the authors of an article have made substantial contributions to the research and the manuscript, and they share the responsibility when the article presents errors, fraud in some way or violations of copyright.
After submitting an article, the journal does not accept the addition, deletion or change in the order of the authors, in addition we reserve the right to release the article when it has been submitted to the journal and under no circumstances will American Thought accept the article. withdrawal of an article during any phase of the editorial process
