Learning by doing and academic performance in Business Administration students

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21803/penamer.16.32.659

Keywords:

Higher Education, business management, teamwork, learning by doing

Abstract

Introduction: Traditional education in the classroom has been questioned in its ability to respond to the needs of the knowledge society, so the center of the discussion is directed to the change of methodologies that are more suitable and coherent with the environment, such as the learning by doing methodology, expressed as experiential learning that forces the student to solve problems outside the classroom. Objective: The objective of this article is to analyze how the Learning by Doing methodology is related to the academic performance of business administration students. Methodology: the comparison of the final grades of two groups of students is proposed: group A made up of a sample of 34 students (control group that took the subject in the first semester of 2022, in the traditional way) and group B (experimental group that took the subject in the second semester of 2022 under the aforementioned methodology) made up of a sample of 29 students. Likewise, group B was measured at two moments (before and after having participated in learning by doing activities) with a pre and post test. Results: The results showed an improvement in the grades of group B, additionally an improvement in leadership, innovation and creativity skills was observed in the students of this group. Conclusions: This research highlights the need to adopt methodologies such as learning by doing in the training of business administrators.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Libnazaret Betancourt Rodriguez, Institución Universitaria Americana

    Magíster en Competitividad y Sustentabilidad. Docente Investigador, Institución Universitaria Americana. Barranquilla (Colombia)

  • Jorge Mejía Turizo, UNIVERSIDAD DEL ATLÁNTICO

    Doctor en Derecho, Ciencia política y Criminología. Docente e investigador asociado

  • Adelaida del Carmen Ojeda Beltrán , UNIVERSIDAD DEL ATLÁNTICO

    Magister en Administración de Organizaciones. Docente Investigador

References

Arias, O., & Fidalgo, R. (2013). La innovación educativa en la Educación Superior. In O. Arias & R. Fidalgo (Eds.), Innovación educativa en la educación superior: fundamentos, evaluación e instrucción (pp. 13–25). Editorial Académica Española Letonia.

Azanza, G., Fernández-Villarán, A., & Goytia, A. (2022). Enhancing Learning in Tourism Education by Combining Learning by Doing and Team Coaching. Education Sciences, 12(8), 548.

Bradberry, L. A., & De Maio, J. (2019). Learning by doing: The long-term impact of experiential learning programs on student success. Journal of Political Science Education, 15(1), 94-111.

Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (1985). Reflection: Turning Experience into Learning (1st ed.). RoutledgeFalmer Taylor & Francis Group. https://www.ptonline.com/articles/how-to-get-better-mfi-results

De la Barrera, M. (2019). El diseño gráfico. Las transformaciones tecnológicas de una profesión creativa (1st ed.). Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes.

De la Barrera, M., & Ramírez, R. (2022). Aprender haciendo. La realización de proyectos gráficos a través del conocimiento tácito. ZincoGrafía, 6(12), 135–155. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32870/zcr.v6i12.145

Del Castillo, Á. (2022). CASO DIDÁCTICO. GAMIFICACIÓN EN EDUCACIÓN SUPERIOR: DÁNDOLE LA VUELTA A LA FORMACIÓN EN ESTUDIOS PRESENCIALES Y ONLINE. Journal of Management and Business Education, 5(3), 282–296. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35564/jmbe.2022.0017

Dewey, J. (1952). La busca de la certeza: un estudio de la relación entre el conocimiento y la acción. Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Dewey, J. (2008). El arte como experiencia. Ediciones Paidós Ibérica, S.A.

Fernández, A. (2006). Metodologías activas para la formación de competencias. Educatio Siglo XXI, 24, 35–56.

Fernández, R., & Wompner, F. (2007). Aprender a aprender. Un método valioso para la educación superior. Observatorio de La Economía Latinoamericana, 3613.

Gómez López, R., Odriozola, M. D., Llorente, I., & Baraibar-Diez, E. (2022). Teaching Organizational Structure Through the Case Method. Journal of Management and Business Education, 5(3), 297–318. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35564/jmbe.2022.0018

Jonassen, D., Mayes, T., & McAleese, R. (1993). A Manifesto for a Constructivist Approach to Uses of Technology in Higher Education. In T. M. Duffy, T.M., Lowyck, J., Jonassen, D.H., Welsh (Ed.), Designing Environments for Constructive Learning (NATO ASI S, pp. 231–247). Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1993. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-78069-1_12

Margalef, L., & Pareja, N. (2008). Un camino sin retorno: estrategias metodológicas de aprendizaje activo. Revista Interuniversitaria de Formación Del Profesorado, 22(3), 47–62.

Mateos-Noza, J., & Martínez Velilla, N. (2018). El odds ratio y su interpretación como magnitud del efecto en investigación. Educación Médica, 19(1), 65–66. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edumed.2017.01.007 1575-1813/

Niiranen, S. (2021). Supporting the development of students’ technological understanding in craft and technology education via the learning-by-doing approach. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 31, 81-93.

Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation (1st editio). Oxford University Press.

Ontoria, A. (2004). Aprendizaje centrado en el alumno. Nueva mentalidad docente en la convergencia europea. ED.UCO. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 1, 38–61. https://doi.org/ISSN 1698-7209

Palazón-Pérez, A., Gómez, M., Gómez, J., Pérez, M. C., & Gómez, J. (2011). RELACIÓN ENTRE LA APLICACIÓN DE METODOLOGÍAS DOCENTES ACTIVAS Y EL APRENDIZAJE DEL ESTUDIANTE UNIVERSITARIO. Bordón, 63(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/ISNN: 0210-5934

Putnam, H. (1992). William James’s Ideas: with Ruth Anna Putnam. In J. Conant (Ed.), Realism with a human face (p. 422). Harvard University Press.

Robledo, P., Fidalgo, R., Arias, O., & Álvarez, M. L. (2015). Percepción de los estudiantes sobre el desarrollo de competencias a través de diferentes metodologías activas. Revista de Investigacion Educativa, 33(2), 369–383. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/rie.33.2.201381

Rodríguez-Conde, M. J., García-Peñalvo, F. J., & García-Holgado, A. (2017). Pretest y postest para evaluar la implementación de una metodología activa en la docencia de Ingeniería del Software. (Technical Report GRIAL-TR-2017-007) (Vol. 58, Issue 12). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1034822

Rodríguez Garcia, A. B., & Ramírez Lopez, L. J. (2014). Aprender haciendo, investigar reflexionando: caso de estudio paralelo en Colombia y Chile. Revista Academia y Virtualidad, 7(2), 53. https://doi.org/10.18359/ravi.318

Rodríguez, L. (2021). LEARNING NEW INNOVATIVE METHODOLOGIES USED IN COVID-19 TIMES. Journal of Management and Business Education, 4(3), 338–353. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35564/jmbe.2021.0018

Ruiz, G. (2013). La teoría de la experiencia de John Dewey: significación histórica y vigencia en el debate teórico contemporáneo. Foro de Educación, 11(15), 103–124.

Schank, R. (2005). Lessons in Learning, e-Learning, and Training: Perspectives and Guidance for the Enlightened Trainer (1st ed.). Pfeiffer. http://search.proquest.com/docview/231202052?accountid=35465%255Cnhttp://sfx.dbc.dk/dbc-45DBC_UCN?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&genre=unknown&sid=ProQ:ProQ%253Aeducation&atitle=Lessons+in+Learning%252C+e-Learning%252C+and+Tr

Zabalza, M. (2011). Nuevos enfoques para la didáctica universitaria actual. Perspectiva, 29(2), 387–416. https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-795X.2011v29n2p387

Published

2023-10-23 — Updated on 2023-10-23

Versions

How to Cite

Cortés Bracho, O., Betancourt Rodriguez, L., Mejía Turizo, J., & Ojeda Beltrán , A. del C. (2023). Learning by doing and academic performance in Business Administration students. Pensamiento Americano, 16(32), e-659. https://doi.org/10.21803/penamer.16.32.659