Profile of the public administrator in Colombia: a view from industry 4.0 and the social appropriation of knowledge
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21803/penamer.15.29.431Keywords:
Public administration, knowledge management, social appropriation of knowledge, industry 4.0Abstract
Introduction: Restructuring aspects within public organizations, one of them was the issue of professionalization of the public service, although this was initially raised for the high bureaucracy, as a starting point for managerial reform. Objective: The purpose of the article is to reflect on the relationship of the profile of the public administrator in Colombia from the social appropriation of knowledge and the challenges that industry 4.0 implies. Reflection: For both industry 4.0 and the social appropriation of knowledge, the profile of the Public Administrator is based on research and technological development and innovation in the organization and management of the State, citizenship and construction of the public. Conclusions: they correspond to the challenges of the profile of the professional in Public Administration, which must be clearly noticed the bet of what it implies to be located in the orientation of the methods and / or methodologies of research focused on the appropriation of knowledge and the use of technologies related to industry 4.0 that should lead to innovative products and services.
Downloads
References
Ananiadou, K., & Claro, M. (2009). 21st century skills and competences for new millennium learners in OECD countries. In OECD Education Working Papers (Issue 41). http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/218525261154
Angiola, N., & Bianchi, P. (2015). Public Managers’ Skills Development for Effective Performance Management: Empirical evidence from Italian local governments. Public Management Review, 17(4), 517–542. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.798029
Bunk, G. (1994). La transmisión de las competencias en la formación y perfeccionamiento profesionales de la RFA. Revista Europea de Formación Profesional, 1, 8–14.
Carretero, S., Vuorikari, R., & Punie, Y. (2017). DigComp 2.1: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens. With eight proficiency levels and examples of use. In Publications Office of the European Union. http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC106281/web-digcomp2.1pdf_(online).pdf
Centro Latinoamericano de Administración para el Desarrollo. (2007). Carta Iberoamericana del Gobierno Electrónico (Vol. 2007, Issue 18).
Centro Latinoamericano de Administración para el Desarrollo (CLAD). (1999). Una nueva gestión pública para América Latina. In Economía y Sociedad (Issue 9).
Criado, J. I. (2021). Digital Public Administration in Latin America: Digitalization, Public Innovation, and the Future of Technologies in the Public Sector. In The Emerald Handbook of Public Administration in Latin America. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83982-676-420201014
Departamento Administrativo de la Función Pública. (2018). Resolución 0667 de 2018.
Departamento Administrativo de la Función Pública. (2021a). Manual operativo del modelo integrado de planeación y gestión (p. 98). https://www.funcionpublica.gov.co/documents/28587410/34112007/Manual+Operativo+MIPG.pdf/ce5461b4-97b7-be3b-b243-781bbd1575f3
Departamento Administrativo de la Función Pública. (2021b). Plan Nacional de competencias Laborales en el sector público.
Fareri, S., Fantoni, G., Chiarello, F., Coli, E., & Binda, A. (2020). Estimating Industry 4.0 impact on job profiles and skills using text mining. Computers in Industry, 118, 103222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2020.103222
Fierro, F. A. (2017). Las competencias laborales en el sector púbico: un análisis desde las escuelas de las competencias laborales. Administración y Desarrollo, 47(2), 92–108. https://doi.org/10.22431/25005227.366
Guerrero Serón, A. (1999). El enfoque de las competencias profesionales: una solución conflictiva a la relación entre formación y empleo. Revista Complutense de Educación, 10(1), 335–335. https://doi.org/10.5209/RCED.18144
Hawes, G., & Corvalán, O. (2005). Construcción de un perfil profesional.
Hermann, M., Pentek, T., & Otto, B. (2016). Design principles for industrie 4.0 scenarios. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2016-March, 3928–3937. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2016.488
Hoffmann, T. (1999). The Meaning of Competence. Journal of European Industrial Training, 23(6), 275–285. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203814796-13
Hunnius, S., & Schuppan, T. (2013). Competency requirements for transformational e-government. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1664–1673. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2013.139
Lasi, H., Fettke, P., Kemper, H. G., Feld, T., & Hoffmann, M. (2014). Industry 4.0. Business and Information Systems Engineering, 6(4), 239–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-014-0334-4
Lukac, D. (2015). The fourth ICT-based Industrial Revolution “Industry 4.0”- HMI and the case of CAE /CAD innovation with EPLAN P8. 23rd Telecommunications Forum TELFOR 2015, 835–838.
McClelland, D. C. (1973). Testing for competence rather than for “intelligence.” The American Psychologist, 28(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034092
Ni, A. Y., & Chen, Y. C. (2016). A Conceptual Model of Information Technology Competence for Public Managers: Designing Relevant MPA Curricula for Effective Public Service. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 22(2), 193–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2016.12002241
OECD, & ILO. (2018). Approaches to anticipating skills for the future of work (Issue June). https://www.ilo.org/global/about-the-ilo/how-the-ilo-works/multilateral-system/g20/reports/WCMS_646143/lang--en/index.htm
Osborne, D. T., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing Government (P. Group (ed.)).
Peña Vera, T., & Pirela Morillo, J. (2007). La complejidad del análisis documental. Información, Cultura y Sociedad, 0(16), 55–81. https://doi.org/10.34096/ics.i16.869
Ramió, C. (2015). La Administración Pública del Futuro: La Administración “2050” GIGAPP Grupo de Investigación en Gobierno, Administración y Políticas Públicas. Programa de Doctorado en Gobierno y Administración Pública. Instituto Universitario de Investigación Ortega y Gasset. (ISSN: 2174‐9515). En: http://gigapp.org/index.php/publicaciones/working‐papers‐gigapp98; 1-44.
Reichard, C. (1998). Education and training for new public management. In International Public Management Journal (Vol. 1, Issue 2, pp. 177–194). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7494(99)80090-7
Roblek, V., Meško, M., & Krapež, A. (2016). A Complex View of Industry 4.0. SAGE Open, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016653987
Roll, M. J. J., & Ifenthaler, D. (2021). Multidisciplinary digital competencies of pre-service vocational teachers. Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40461-021-00112-4
Thoben, K. D., Wiesner, S. A., & Wuest, T. (2017). “Industrie 4.0” and smart manufacturing-a review of research issues and application examples. International Journal of Automation Technology, 11(1), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.20965/ijat.2017.p0004
UNESCO. (1998). Declaracion Mundial Sobre la Eduación superior en el sigo XXI : Visión y acción. Educación Superior y Sociedad, 9(2), 97–113. https://www.iesalc.unesco.org/ess/index.php/ess3/article/view/171/162
van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J. A. M., van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & de Haan, J. (2017). The relation between 21st-century skills and digital skills: A systematic literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 577–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.010
van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J. A. M., van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & de Haan, J. (2020). Determinants of 21st-Century Skills and 21st-Century Digital Skills for Workers: A Systematic Literature Review. SAGE Open, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019900176
Wang, S., Wan, J., Li, D., & Zhang, C. (2016). Implementing Smart Factory of Industrie 4.0: An Outlook. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/3159805
Yang, F., & Gu, S. (2021). Industry 4.0, a revolution that requires technology and national strategies. Complex & Intelligent Systems. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-020-00267-9
Urrego-Estrada, G., Gutiérrez-Ossa, J., & Jurado-Zambrano, D. (2021). Gestión del conocimiento en las Instituciones de Educación Superior para la apropiación social del conocimiento. Pensamiento Y Acción, (31), 27-51. https://doi.org/10.19053/01201190.n31.2021.12492
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2024-07-05 (3)
- 2024-06-12 (2)
- 2022-05-27 (1)
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Pensamiento Americano
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The author or authors of an article accepted for publication in the Journal Pensamiento Americano will transfer all of the patrimonial rights to the American University Corporation free of charge, within which are included: the right to edit, publish, reproduce and distribute both print media as digital, in addition to include in article in international indexes and / or databases, likewise, the Editorial Seal is authorized to use the images, tables and / or any graphic material presented in the article for the design of covers or posters from the same magazine. By assuming the patrimonial rights of the article, it may not be partially or totally reproduced in any printed or digital media without its express permission.
AUTHORITY ASPECTS
For the Pensamiento Americano Journal, all the authors of an article have made substantial contributions to the research and the manuscript, and they share the responsibility when the article presents errors, fraud in some way or violations of copyright.
After submitting an article, the journal does not accept the addition, deletion or change in the order of the authors, in addition we reserve the right to release the article when it has been submitted to the journal and under no circumstances will American Thought accept the article. withdrawal of an article during any phase of the editorial process
