Criticismo reto?rico: teori?a, aplicacio?n y cri?tica
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21803/pensam.v11i21-1.267Palavras-chave:
Retórica, Filemón, Hermenéutica, Biblia, HistoriaResumo
Resumen
El presente arti?culo busca describir el enfoque hermene?utico conocido como “criticismo retorico”, analizar sus presuposiciones, aplicar el enfoque a la carta de Filemo?n y por ultimo ofrecer una cri?tica del enfoque. Este estudio muestra que el criticismo retorico resulta ser una herramienta u?til para la hermene?utica literaria ya que en reaccio?n a los movimientos que colocan el significado del texto en la comunidad que lo crea, el criticismo retorico busca determinar las intenciones del autor y los elementos que e?l uso? para hacer persuasivo su discurso.
Palabras Clave: Reto?rica, Filemo?n, Hermene?utica, Biblia, Historia.
Abstract
This article seeks to describe the hermeneutical approach known as "rhetorical criticism", analyze its presuppositions, apply the approach to the letter of Philemon and finally offer a critique of the approach. This study shows that rhetorical criticism turns out to be a useful tool for literary hermeneutics since in reaction to the movements that place the meaning of the text in the community that creates it, the rhetorical criticism seeks to determine the intentions of the author and the elements that he used to make his speech persuasive.
Keywords: Rhetoric, Philemon, Hermeneutics, Bible, History.
Resumo
O presente artigo busca descrever o enfoque hermene?utico conhecido como “criticismo reto?rico”, analisar suas pressuposic?o?es, aplicar o enfoque a? carta de Filemon e por u?ltimo oferecer uma cri?tica a esse enfoque. Este estudo mostra que o criticismo reto?rico resulta ser uma ferramenta u?til para a hermene?utica litera?ria ja? que esta? em reac?a?o aos movimentos que colocam o significado do texto na comunidade que o cria. O criticismo reto?rico busca determinar as intenc?o?es do autor e os elementos que ele usou para fazer persuasivo o seu discurso.
Palavras chave: Reto?rica, Filemon, Hermene?utica, Bi?blia, Histo?ria
Downloads
Referências
Aristóteles & Racionero, Q. (2007). Retórica. Barcelona: RBA.
Baird, W. (2013). History of New Testament Research: Vol. 3 : From C.H. Dodd to Hans Dieter Betz (Vol. 3). Min- neapolis: Fortress Press.
Betz, H. D. (1975). The Literary Composition and Function of Paul’s Letter to the Galatians. New Testament Studies, 21, 353–379.
Betz, H. D. (1979). Galatians: A Commentary on Paul’s Letter to the Churches in Galatia. Philadelphia: Fortress Press.
Bruce, F. F. (1984). The Epistles to the Colossians, to Phile- mon, and to the Ephesians. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans Publishing Company.
Church, F. F. (1978). Rhetorical structure and design in Paul’s letter to Philemon. Harvard Theological Review, 71(2).
De vos, C. (2001). Once a slave, always a slave?: slavery, manumission and relational patterns in Paul’s letter to Philemon.. Journal for the Study of the New Testament, 82, 89–105.
Dunn, J. (1996). The Epistles to the Colossians and to Philemon : A Commentary on the Greek Text. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans Publishing Company.
Eire, A. L. (2001). Los fundamentos de la Retórica. Bahía Blanca, Bs. As: Universidad Nacional del Sur.
Fitzmyer, J. A. (2008). The Letter to Philemon: A New Translation With Introduction and Commentary.
New Haven, Conn: Yale University Press. 117
Jewett, R. (1986). The Thessalonian Correspondence: Pauline Rhetoric and Millenarian Piety. Philadel- phia: Fortress Press.
Kennedy, G. (1980). Classical Rhetoric and its Christian and Secular Tradition from Ancient to Modern Times. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Kennedy, G. (1984). New Testament Interpretation Through Rhetorical Criticism. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Kennedy, G. (1997). The Genres of Rhetoric. En S. Porter (Ed.), Handbook Of Classical Rhetoric In The Hellenistic Period, 330 B.C.-A.D. 400. Leiden: Brill.
Kern, P. H. (1998). Rhetoric and Galatians: assessing an approach to Paul’s epistle. Cambridge, U.K. ; New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lampe, P. & Sampley, P. (2010). Paul and Rhetoric. New York: T&T Clark.
Mack, B. L. (1990). Rhetoric and the New Testament. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.
Melick, R. (2001). Philippians, Colissians, Philemon (Vol. 32). Nashville, TN: Broadman & Holman.
Mitchell, M. (1993). Paul and the Rhetoric of Reconciliation: An Exegetical Investigation of the Language and Composition of 1 Corinthians. Louisville, Ky: Westminster/John Knox Press.
Moo, D. J. (2008). The Letters to the Colossians and to Philemon, The Pillar New Testament commentary. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans Publishing Company.
Perelman, C. & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969). The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Porter, S. (1997). Handbook of Classical Rhetoric in the Hellenistic Period, 330 B.C.-A.D. 400. Leiden: Brill.
Porter, S., Porter, S., & Olbricht, T. (2001). The Theoretical Justification for Application of Rhetorical Categories to Pauline Epistolary Literature. En Rhetoric and the New Testament: Essays from the1992 Heidelberg
Conference. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.
Robbins, V. (1996). Exploring the Texture of Texts: A Guide to Socio-Rhetorical Interpretation. Valley Forge, PA: Trinity Press.
Sanders, L. (2004). Equality and a request for the manumission of Onesimus. Restoration Quarterly, 46(2).
Velardo, L. (2014). ¿Rétor o epistológrafo?: una reflexión sobre el análisis Retórico del epistolario paulino. Da- varLogos, XIII, 42–44.
Wallace, D. B. (1996). Greek Grammar Beyond the Basics: An Exegetical Syntax of the New Testament. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.
Walton, S. (1995). What has Aristotle to do with Paul? Rhetorical criticism and1 Thessalonians. Tyndale Bulletin, 46.
Watson, D., & Hauser, A. (1994). Rhetorical Criticism of the Bible: A Comprehensive Bibliography with Notes on History and Method. Leiden: Brill.
Witherington, B. I. (2007). The Letters to Philemon, the Colossians, and the Ephesians : A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary on the Captivity Epistles. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans Publishing Company.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2018 Pensamiento Americano
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The author or authors of an article accepted for publication in the Journal Pensamiento Americano will transfer all of the patrimonial rights to the American University Corporation free of charge, within which are included: the right to edit, publish, reproduce and distribute both print media as digital, in addition to include in article in international indexes and / or databases, likewise, the Editorial Seal is authorized to use the images, tables and / or any graphic material presented in the article for the design of covers or posters from the same magazine. By assuming the patrimonial rights of the article, it may not be partially or totally reproduced in any printed or digital media without its express permission.
AUTHORITY ASPECTS
For the Pensamiento Americano Journal, all the authors of an article have made substantial contributions to the research and the manuscript, and they share the responsibility when the article presents errors, fraud in some way or violations of copyright.
After submitting an article, the journal does not accept the addition, deletion or change in the order of the authors, in addition we reserve the right to release the article when it has been submitted to the journal and under no circumstances will American Thought accept the article. withdrawal of an article during any phase of the editorial process
