A antropomorfização do vínculo humano-animal na dinâmica familiar: uma análise documental
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21803/penamer.17.33.618Palavras-chave:
Antropomorfismo, Família, Animal de estimação, Animal Doméstico, Animais De EstimaçãoResumo
Introdução: O estudo da interação entre humanos e animais de companhia tem vindo a ganhar relevância devido às alterações nas dinâmicas sociais actuais. Objetivo: Realizar uma revisão documental da evolução da investigação sobre a antropomorfização em
animais e o seu impacto na ligação humano-animal caraterística das dinâmicas familiares contemporâneas. Metodologia: Trata-se de um estudo de revisão documental apoiado na ferramenta web Tree of Science (ToS) para seleção de literatura. A pesquisa foi
efectuada nas bases de dados Scopus e Web of Science. Foram incluídos na revisão 31 estudos. Resultados: Os resultados foram segmentados em estudos clássicos, estruturais e recentes, constatando-se que a antropomorfização do animal e a sua inclusão na família
permite modificar comportamentos e estabelecer hábitos na vida familiar. O papel dos animais no contexto familiar é diretamente influenciado pelo grau de antropomorfização dos mesmos, o que gera benefícios e prejuízos para a família, para os animais de companhia e para os seus cuidadores directos. Conclusões: As práticas de antropomorfização
respondem às mudanças contemporâneas nas relações humanas e à perceção de solidão, podendo promover vínculos na interação humano-animal e humano-humano.
Downloads
Referências
Acero, M. (2017) La Relación Humano-Animal de Compañía como un fenómeno sociocultural. Perspectivas para la salud pública. Universidad Nacional de Colombia. [Tesis doctoral, Universidad Nacional de Colombia]. Repositorio institucional de la Universidad Nacional de Colombia.https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/handle/unal/58863/MyriamAceroAguilar.2017.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Amiot, C., Bastian, B. & Martens, P. (2016). People and Companion Animals: It Takes Two to Tango. BioScience, 66(7), 552–560, https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biw051
Amiot, C. E.; Bastian, B. & Rosenfeld, C. S. (2017). Solidarity with Animals: Assessing a Relevant Dimension of Social Identification with Animals. PLOS ONE, 12(1), e0168184–. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168184
Applebaum, J. & Zsembik, B. (2020). Pet Attachment in the Context of Family Conflict, Anthrozoös, 33(3), 361-370. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2020.1746524
Arias, L. (2018). Estudio cualitativo del vínculo entre jóvenes y sus mascotas en Lima Metropolitana. Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC). http://hdl.handle.net/10757/624117
Archer, J. (1996). Why Do People Love Their Pets? Department of Psychology, University of Central Lancashire, Preston.
Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística -DANE- (2019) Resultados Censo Nacional de Población y Vivienda 2018. https://www.dane.gov.co/files/censo2018/informacion-tecnica/presentaciones-territorio/190709-CNPV-presentacion-medellin.pdf
Díaz Videla, M., Olarte., M. A., Camacho, J. (2015). Perfiles básicos del humano compañero del perro: Una revisión teórica en antrozoología guiada por el enfoque multimodal. Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento, 7(3), 79-89.
Díaz Videla, M. & Olarte, M. A. (2016). Animales de compañía, personalidad humana y los beneficios percibidos por los custodios. Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencia Psicológica, 8(2), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.5872/psiencia/8.2.21
Díaz Videla, M. (2017a). El antropomorfismo en la relación humano-perro de compañía: ¿Recurso o indicador de patología? En M. Díaz Videla & M. A. Olarte (Eds), Antrozoología. Potencial recurso de intervención clínica (pp. 49-64). Editorial de la Universidad Flores. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326190206_El_antropomorfismo_en_la_relacion_humano-perro_de_compania_Recurso_o_indicador_de_patologia
Díaz Videla, M. (2019). El valor de la vida de los animales de compañía: El vínculo humano-animal, más allá del especismo y de consideraciones económicas. Revista Latinoamericana De Estudios Críticos Animales, 6(1), 1-33. https://revistaleca.org/index.php/leca/article/view/244
Díaz Videla, M., & Olarte, M. (2019). Diferencias de género en distintas dimensiones del vínculo humano-perro: estudio descriptivo en Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 28, 109- 124. https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v28n2.72891
Díaz Videla, M., & Rodríguez Ceberio, M. (2020). Las mascotas en el sistema familiar. Legitimidad, formación y dinámicas de las familias humano-animal. Revista de Psicología, 18(1), 44-63. https://doi.org/10.24215/2422572Xe036
Dotson, M. J., & Hyatt, E. M. (2008). Understanding dog–human companionship. Journal of Business Research, 61(5), 457–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.07.019
Eddy, TJ., Gallup, G. G., & Povinelli, D. J. (1993). Attribution of Cognitive States to Animals: Anthropomorphism in Comparative Perspective. Social Issues, 49(1), 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1993.tb00910.x
Ellingsen, K. Zanella, A. J., Bjerkås, E., & Indrebø, A. (2010). The Relationship between Empathy, Perception of Pain and Attitudes toward Pets among Norwegian Dog Owners. Anthrozoos: A Multidisciplinary Journal of The Interactions of People & Animals, 23(3), 231–243. https://doi.org/10.2752/175303710x12750451258931
Epley, N., Waytz A., Akalis, S., & Cacioppo, J. (2008). When We Need A Human: Motivational Determinants Of Anthropomorphism. Social Cognition, 26(2), 143-155 https://guilfordjournals.com/doi/pdf/10.1521/soco.2008.26.2.143
García, K. (2020). Si no es un hijo, entonces ¿qué? Otras relaciones para ser-hacer familia a partir de la elección de no reproducción biológica masculina en la Ciudad de México. Antrópica. Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, 6(11), 283-306. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=7397005
Herwijnen, I., Van De Borg, J., Naguib, M., & Beerda, B. (2020). Dog-Directed Parenting Styles Mirror Dog Owners’ Orientations Toward Animals. Anthrozoös, 33(6), 759-773. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2020.1824657
Hills, A. (1995). Empathy and Belief in the Mental Experience of Animals, Anthrozoös, 8(3), 132-142.
Jalongo, M. R. (2018). An attachment perspective on the child-dog bond: Interdisciplinary and international research findings. Children, Dogs and Education, 43, 395–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-015-0687-4
McConnell, A. R., Brown, C. M., Shoda, Tonya M., Stayton, L. E., Martin, C. E. (2011). Friends with benefits: On the positive consequences of pet ownership. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(6), 1239–1252. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024506
McConnell, A.R., Paige Lloyd, E., Humphrey, B.T. (2019). We Are Family: Viewing Pets as Family Members Improves Wellbeing. Anthrozoös, 32(4), 459–470. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2019.1621516
Milner, J. S. (1994). Assessing physical child abuse risk: The Child Abuse Potential Inventory. Clinical Psychology Review, 14(6), 547-583.
Mota-Rojas, D., Mariti, C., Zdeinert, A., Riggio, G., Mora-Medina, P., del Mar Reyes, A., Gazzano, A., Domínguez-Oliva, A., Lezama-García, K., José-Pérez, N., & Hernández-Ávalos, I. (2021). Anthropomorphism and Its Adverse Effects on the Distress and Welfare of Companion Animals. Animals, 11, 32-63. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11113263
Prato-Previde., E., Custance, C., Spiezio, C., & Sabatini, F. (2003). Is the Dog-Human Relationship an Attachment Bond? An Observational Study Using Ainsworth’s Strange Situation. Behaviour, 140(2), 225–254. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4536022
Phillips, C. S. (2003). Can Pets Function as Family Members? Western Journal of Nursing Research, 24(6), 621-638. https://doi.org/10.1177/019394502320555386
Ramírez, A. (2020). Influencia de la Mascota en la Dinámica Familiar en 3 parejas jóvenes sin hijos entre los 30 a 35 años de edad en el Municipio de Sevilla Valle, Colombia. Universidad Antonio Nariño. http://repositorio.uan.edu.co/bitstream/123456789/2190/2/2020AlexandraRami%CC%81rezdelaCruz.pdf
Raupp, C.D. (1999). Treasuring, Trashing or Terrorizing: Adult Outcomes of Childhood Socialization about Companion Animals. Society & Animals, 7(2), 141–159. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853099X00040
Reyes, P., Albornoz, A., Fernández, N., Ferrari, M., Podestá, A., Rizzuti, A., & Díaz-Videla, M. (2020). Las mascotas en las dinámicas familiares: comparaciones de triangulaciones de parejas con hijos y con animales. Ajayu, 18(2), 312-350 http://www.scielo.org.bo/pdf/rap/v18n2/v18n2_a02.pdf
Reyes-Jiménez, J., Torres-Porras, J., Alcántara, J., & Rodríguez-Hidalgo., (2021). La actitud hacia el bienestar animal de estudiantes universitarios y personas mayores de sesenta años: el género y la edad como elementos clave. Didáctica de las Ciencias Experimentales y Sociales, 40, 81-96. https://doi.org/10.7203/DCES.40.18048
Robledo, S.; Osorio, G., & López, C. (2014). Networking en pequeña empresa: una revisión bibliográfica utilizando la teoria de grafos. Revista Vínculos, 11(2), 6-16. https://dx.doi.org/10.14483/2322939X.9664
Sable, P. (2013). The Pet Connection: An Attachment Perspective. Clinical Social Work Journal, 41(1), 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-012-0405-2
Sanders, C. R. (1993). Understanding Dogs: Caretakers' Attributions of Mindedness in Canine-Human Relationships. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 22(2), 205–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124193022002003
Sanders, C. R. (2003). Actions Speak Louder than Words: Close Relationships between Humans and Nonhuman Animals. University of Connecticut
Serpell, J. A. (2003). Anthropomorphism and Anthropomorphic Selection—Beyond the "Cute Response". Society & Animals, 11 (1), 83–100. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853003321618864
Serpell, J. A. (2019). How happy is your pet? The Problem of subjectivity in the assessment of companion animal welfare. Animal Welfare. 28, 57-66. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.28.1.057.
Tancara Q, C. (1993). La Investigación Documental. Temas Sociales, (17), 91-106. http://www.scielo.org.bo/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0040-29151993000100008&lng=es&tlng=es.
Topal, J., Miklosi, A., Csanyi, V., & Deka, A. (1998). Attachment Behavior in Dogs (Canis familiaris): A New Application of Ainsworth's (1969) Strange Situation Test. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 112(3), 219-229. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.112.3.219
Valencia-Hernandez, D., Robledo, S., Pinilla, R., Duque Méndez, N.D & Olivar-Tost, G. (2020). SAP Algorithm for Citation Analysis: An improvement to Tree of Science. Ingeniería e Investigación, 40(1), 45-49. https://doi.org/10.15446/ing.investig.v40n1.77718
Walsh, F. (2009). Human-animal bonds II: the role of pets in family systems and family therapy. Family Process, 48(4), 481-99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2009.01297.x
Downloads
Publicado
Versões
- 2024-05-15 (3)
- 2024-06-24 (2)
- 2024-05-16 (1)
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2024 Pensamiento Americano
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The author or authors of an article accepted for publication in the Journal Pensamiento Americano will transfer all of the patrimonial rights to the American University Corporation free of charge, within which are included: the right to edit, publish, reproduce and distribute both print media as digital, in addition to include in article in international indexes and / or databases, likewise, the Editorial Seal is authorized to use the images, tables and / or any graphic material presented in the article for the design of covers or posters from the same magazine. By assuming the patrimonial rights of the article, it may not be partially or totally reproduced in any printed or digital media without its express permission.
AUTHORITY ASPECTS
For the Pensamiento Americano Journal, all the authors of an article have made substantial contributions to the research and the manuscript, and they share the responsibility when the article presents errors, fraud in some way or violations of copyright.
After submitting an article, the journal does not accept the addition, deletion or change in the order of the authors, in addition we reserve the right to release the article when it has been submitted to the journal and under no circumstances will American Thought accept the article. withdrawal of an article during any phase of the editorial process
