The purpose of the process

Authors

  • Iván Alfonso Cordero Gutiérrez Corporación Universitaria Americana

Keywords:

Judge, decision, argumentation

Abstract

The type of state that Colombia made since 1991 (Rule of Law), implies that the state fulfill the objectives are shared with the population, thus generating degrees of responsibility for the costs borne by them and the State for the realization of the objectives. The satisfaction of people’s basic needs as one of the essential purposes of the rule of law, no exception to this scheme, which determines the harmonious cooperation not only between institutions and agencies of state but of this, supplemented by the population . One of the basic needs of the population, refers to the ability to resolve conflicts using the mechanisms for this purpose is available,
using the forms of self government, self-resolution, hybrid and heterocomposiciòn, the State authorized according to the guidelines
of each mechanism with respect to the matters that make sutanciales rights are discussed in relationship conflict. Within these
dispute resolution mechanisms, the heterocomposiciòn has one called the court process, where a third party vested with specific
powers and exercising jurisdiction, the decision on the conflict, after the exhaustion of successive stages and preclusive to ensure
the effective participation , exercise and defense of fundamental rights of the parties and substantial, generating greater assurance
of legality on the decision generated by the third party have full jurisdiction (the Judge). As the court process more suitable mechanism
for its regulated state protection and modernized, must be protected, strengthened and preferred over the so-called courts as
equivalent to these the State intends to displace competition when resolving conflicts, creating a climate disfavoring due process.
The ineffectiveness of the judicial system is not due to judicial proceedings as such but to the sum of several human factors, technical
and infrastructure that are not remedied by dismissing the use of this-the process, other mechanisms to encourage less offer
guarantees which may become sharpen more conflicts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acuerdo No. PSAA08-4550 DE 2008 Colombia, CONSEJO SUPERIOR DE LA JUDICATURA.

BORDALI Salamanca, Andrés, “JUSTICIA PRIVADA” Revista de derecho (Valdivia) versión On-line ISSN 0718-0950 Rev. Derecho (Valdivia) v.16 Valdivia jul. 2004 doi: 10.4067/S0718-09502004000100008 Revista de Derecho, Vol. XVI, julio 2004, p. 165-186 ESTUDIOS E INVESTIGACIONES.

Corporación Excelencia en la Justicia artículo 23 de junio de 2009, …”PROYECTOS DE DESCONGESTIÓN DE PROCESOS REQUIERE PLANES DE AVANZADA”. Constitución Política Colombia, Artículos 1, 2, 29, 228, 229.

Ley 1194 de 2008 Colombia, Artículo 1.

Ley 1285 de 2009 Colombia, Artículo 23.

LEY 497 DE 1999 Colombia, Artículo 1, 9 y 22.

PRIETO Sanchis, Luis et al. Neo constitucionalismo y

Ponderación Judicial. En Neo constitucionalismo(s), Edición

de Miguel Carbonell, Trotta. Madrid, 2005, p. 131-

4 AGUILÓ REGLA, Joseph. Ob. cit., p. 9-10.

RAMÍREZ Carvajal, Diana María. Abogada y Magíster

en Derecho Procesal de la Universidad de Medellín, Doctoranda

de la Universidad Externado de Colombia. Jefe de la

Maestría en Derecho Procesal de la Universidad de Medellín.

Miembro de los Institutos Panamericano y Colombiano

de Derecho Procesal. A propósito de la justicia en la aplicación

del ordenamiento jurídico como sistema integrado de

Fuentes (reflexiones sobre la justicia en el proceso vs. la

justicia material).

Sentencia No. T-406 de 1992, Colombia, CORTE CONSTITUCIONAL, Magistrado Ponente CIRO ANGARITA PABÓN.

TARUFFO, Michelle. La justicia civil:¿opción residual o alternativa posible? En Corrupción y Estado de derecho. Madrid: Trotta, 1996.

VADO Grajales, Luis Octavio, MEDIOS ALTERNATIVOS DE SOLUCIÓN DE CONFLICTOS, http://www.bibliojuridica.

org/libros/5/2264/19.pdf.

Downloads

Published

2011-12-23

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

Cordero Gutiérrez, I. A. (2011). The purpose of the process. Pensamiento Americano, 4(7), 81-86. https://publicaciones.americana.edu.co/index.php/pensamientoamericano/article/view/560