Revisión de técnicas de evaluación formativa para el fortalecimiento de habilidades escritas, orales y prácticas en educación
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21803/penamer.18.37.867Palabras clave:
Evaluación formativa, evaluación del estudiante, desarrollo de habilidades, aprendizaje activo, retroalimentaciónResumen
Introducción: este estudio analiza las técnicas y mecanismos de evaluación formativa presentes en la literatura académica, enfocados en el desarrollo de competencias escritas, orales y prácticas, así como en las subcategorías relacionadas con los objetivos de aprendizaje.; objetivo: identificar y categorizar las técnicas y mecanismos de evaluación formativa empleados en el desarrollo de competencias académicas, complementando el análisis con un enfoque bibliométrico utilizando los paquetes bibliometrix y biblioshiny en R-Studio.; metodología: se realizó una búsqueda en las bases de datos Scopus y WoS. Se consideraron inicialmente 105 artículos, de los cuales 28 fueron seleccionados tras aplicar los criterios de inclusión establecidos por PRISMA.; Resultados: se evidencia una escasez de estudios en español en comparación con los internacionales. La implementación de técnicas de evaluación formativa ha ganado relevancia desde la pandemia, destacándose las evaluaciones escritas que fomentan habilidades como la comunicación clara, el análisis de textos, la correcta aplicación de reglas gramaticales y ortográficas, así como la mejora de la argumentación y la adaptación de la escritura a diferentes contextos; conclusiones: la participación activa de los estudiantes en la evaluación formativa favorece su desarrollo integral, mejora su rendimiento académico y promueve un enfoque proactivo hacia el aprendizaje continuo.
Descargas
Referencias
Aria, M. & Cuccurullo, C. (2017), Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping análisis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975.
Babinčáková, M., Ganajová, M., Sotáková, I., & Bernard, P. (2020). Influence of formative assessment classroom techniques (Facts) on student’s outcomes in chemistry at secondary school. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(1), 36–49. https://doi.org/10.33225/JBSE/20.19.36
Bennett, R. E. (2011). Formative assessment: A critical review. Assessment in education: principles, policy & practice, 18(1), 5-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2010.513678
Bin Mubayrik, H. F. (2020). New Trends in Formative-Summative Evaluations for Adult Education. SAGE Open, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020941006
Bizarro, W., Sucari, W., & Quispe-Coaquira, A. (2019). Evaluación formativa en el marco del enfoque por competencias. Revista innova educación, 1(3), 374-390. https://revistainnovaeducacion.com/index.php/rie/article/view/45
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11092-008-9068-5/FIGURES/2
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2010). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(1), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171009200119/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/10.1177_003172171009200119-FIG1.JPEG
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2018). Classroom assessment and pedagogy. Assessment in education: Principles, policy & practice, 25(6), 551–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2018.1441807
Bloom, B. (1969). Some theoretical issues relating to educational evaluation. Teachers College Record, 70(10), 26-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146816907001003
Cañadas, Laura. (2020). Formative assessment in university context: opportunities and proposals for action. Revista Digital de Investigación en Docencia Universitaria, 14(2), e1214. https://dx.doi.org/10.19083/ridu.2020.1214
Castejón, F., López, V., Julián, J., & Zaragoza, J. (2011). Evaluación formativa y rendimiento académico en la formación inicial del profesorado de Educación Física. Revista Internacional de Medicina y Ciencias de La Actividad Física y El Deporte, 11(42), 328–346. http://cdeporte.rediris.es/revista/revista42/artevaluacion163.htm
Cusi, A., Schacht, F., Aldon, G., & Swidan, O. (2023). Assessment in mathematics: a study on teachers’ practices in times of pandemic. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 55(1), 221–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11858-022-01395-X/FIGURES/2
Decristan, J., Hondrich, A. L., Büttner, G., Hertel, S., Klieme, E., Kunter, M., ... & Hardy, I. (2015). Impact of additional guidance in science education on primary students’ conceptual understanding. The Journal of Educational Research, 108(5), 358-370. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2014.899957
Den Otter, M. J., Juurlink, L. B. F., & Janssen, F. J. J. M. (2022). How to Assess Students’ Structure-Property Reasoning? Journal of Chemical Education, 99(10), 3396–3405. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACS.JCHEMED.2C00234/SUPPL_FILE/ED2C00234_SI_002.DOCX
Diez, Á., & Domínguez, R. (2018). University Tutors as Facilitators of Student-teachers’ Reflective Learning During their Teaching Practice. Estudios Pedagógicos (Valdivia), 44(2), 311–328. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07052018000200311
Fernández, S. (2017). Evaluación y aprendizaje. MarcoELE: Revista de Didáctica Español Lengua Extranjera, (24), 1-43. https://marcoele.com/evaluacion-y-aprendizaje/
Fernández, M., & Cano, E. (2018). Experiencias de retroacción para mejorar la evaluación continuada: el uso de Twitter como tecnología emergente. Educar, 55(2), 437–455. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/educar.872
Ganajová, M., Sotáková, I., Lukáč, S., Ješková, Z., Jurková, V., & Orosová, R. (2021). Formative assessment as a tool to enhance the development of inquiry skills in science education. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 20(2), 204–222. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/21.20.204
García, F. J., Pozuelos, F. J., & Álvarez, C. (2019). Evaluation of the Learning Students by Novel University Teachers. Formación Universitaria, 12(2), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-50062019000200003
García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2022). Desarrollo de estados de la cuestión robustos: Revisiones Sistemáticas de Literatura. Education in the Knowledge Society (EKS), 23, e28600. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.28600
Gedikli, H., & Buldur, S. (2022). The Effects of Formative Assessment Practices in Science Education on Students’ Metacognitive Knowledge and Regulation Skills *. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 37(4), 1393–1415. https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2022.454
Gikandi, J. W., Morrow, D., & Davis, N. E. (2011). Online formative assessment in higher education: A review of the literature. Computers & education, 57(4), 2333-2351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.004
Gosselin, D. C., & Golick, D. (2020). Posters as an effective assessment tool for a capstone course. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 10(4), 426–437. https://doi.org/10.1007/S13412-020-00612-X/FIGURES/3
Guilding, C., Pye, R. E., Butler, S., Atkinson, M., & Field, E. (2021). Answering questions in a co-created formative exam question bank improves summative exam performance, while students perceive benefits from answering, authoring, and peer discussion: A mixed methods analysis of PeerWise. Pharmacology Research & Perspectives, 9(4), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1002/PRP2.833
Hagos, T., & Andargie, D. (2022). Effects of Technology-Integrated Formative Assessment on Students’ Retention of Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge in Chemical Equilibrium Concepts. Science Education International, 33(4), 383–391. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v33.i4.5
Hamodi, C., Victor, |, López, M., & Teresa López Pastor, A. (2015). Medios, técnicas e instrumentos de evaluación formativa y compartida del aprendizaje en educación superior. Perfiles Educativos, 37(147). https://doi.org/10.22201/IISUE.24486167E.2015.147.47271
Ismail, M. A.-A., Ahmad, A., Mohammad, J. A.-M., Fakri, N. M. R. M., Nor, M. Z. M., & Pa, M. N. M. (2019). Using Kahoot! as a formative assessment tool in medical education: A phenomenological study. BMC Medical Education, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1658-z
Kirkwood, D. L., Bremers, E. K., Robinson, E. A., Brazeal, K. R., & Couch, B. A. (2022). Revisiting Clickers: In-Class Questions Followed by At-Home Reflections Are Associated with Higher Student Performance on Related Exam Questions. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.1128/JMBE.00038-22/SUPPL_FILE/JMBE.00038-22-S0001.PDF
Kokhan, R., Matsevko-Bekerska, L., & Lysanets, Y. (2020). Conversation Analysis Tool as an Effective Means for Teaching the University Courses of English and World Literature. Arab World English Journal, 11(4), 307–318. https://doi.org/10.24093/AWEJ/VOL11NO4.20
Kövecses, V. (2018). Cooperative learning in VR environment. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 15(3), 205–224. https://doi.org/10.12700/APH.15.3.2018.3.12
Kumar, A. B. R. (2022). Study on the Correlation Between the Discrimination Index, Facilitation Value and Distractor Efficiency of a Formative Assessment Useful Tools for OBE Practices. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 36(2), 46–54. https://doi.org/10.16920/JEET/2022/V36I2/22153
Meir, E., Wendel, D., Pope, D. S., Hsiao, L., Chen, D., & Kim, K. J. (2019). Are intermediate constraint question formats useful for evaluating student thinking and promoting learning in formative assessments? Computers & Education, 141, 103606. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2019.103606
Ogange, B. O., Agak, J. O., Okelo, K. O., & Kiprotich, P. (2018). Student Perceptions of the Effectiveness of Formative Assessment in an Online Learning Environment. Open Praxis, 10(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.5944/OPENPRAXIS.10.1.705
Otero, F., Vázquez, F., Cenizo, J. & González, J. (2021). Analysis of the assessment in Physical Education curricula in Primary Education”, Sport, Education and Society, 26(8), 903–916.
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJ.N71
Paré, G., Trudel, M. C., Jaana, M., & Kitsiou, S. (2015). Synthesizing information systems knowledge: a typology of literature reviews. Information & Management, 52(2), 183-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014. 08.008
Pino, M., Enrique, J., Carbó, J., & González, M. (2017). La evaluación formativa en el proceso enseñanza aprendizaje. EDUMECENTRO, 9(3), 263–283.
Rodríguez-Gómez, G., & Ibarra-Sáiz, M. S. (2011). e-Evaluación orientada al e-Aprendizaje estratégico en Educación Superior. Narcea.
Scriven, M. (1967). The Methodology of Evaluation. EE.UU., Rand McNally.
Somers, R., Cunningham-Nelson, S., & Boles, W. (2021). Applying natural language processing to automatically assess student conceptual understanding from textual responses. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 37(5), 98–115. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7121
Srivastava, T., Mishra, V., & Lalitbhushan, W. (2018). Formative Assessment Classroom Techniques (FACTs) for Better Learning in Pre-clinical Medical Education: A Controlled Trial. In jf (Vol. 12, Issue 9, pp. JC01–JC08).
Sri Vinodhini, H., Julius Fusic, S., & Bhagyalakshmi, P. (2020). A Smart Board Approach in Teaching Engineering Mathematics Course. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 34(Special Issue), 271–276. https://doi.org/10.16920/JEET/2021/V34I0/157154
Susithra, N., Deepa, M., Reba, P., & Santhanamari, G. (2022). Coalescing Mind Maps as a Learning Aid cum Formative Assessment Tool for Effective Teaching and Learning of Computer Architecture and Organization Course. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 36(Special Issue 2), 236–243. https://doi.org/10.16920/JEET/2023/V36IS2/23034
Syarifudin, Z., & Suharjito, S. (2020). Mobile based for basic English learning assessment with augmented reality. Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems, 5(2), 774–780. https://doi.org/10.25046/AJ050297
Vishwanathan, K., Joshi, A. N., & Patel, M. J. (2022). Perception of Medical Undergraduate Students about an Electronic Practical Examination in Orthopaedics During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 56(4), 689–698. https://doi.org/10.1007/S43465-021-00578-0/TABLES/4
Wallin, P., & Adawi, T. (2017). The reflective diary as a method for the formative assessment of self-regulated learning. European Journal of Engineering Education, 43(4), 507-521. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2017.1290585
Webb, M., Prasse, D., Phillips, M., Kadijevich, D., Angeli, C., Strijker, A., Carvalho, A., Andresen, B., Dobozy, E. & Laugesen, H. (2018). Challenges for IT-Enabled Formative Assessment of Complex 21st Century Skills, Technology Knowledge and Learning, 23(3), 441–456.
Whittard, D., Green, E., Shareef, M. S., & Ismail, I. (2022). The Multidimensional Model of the One-Minute Paper: Advancing theory through theoretical elaboration. International Review of Economics Education, 41, 100248. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IREE.2022.100248
Williams, K., & Williams, H. (2021). Mathematics problem-solving homework as a conduit for parental involvement in learning. Evaluation of a pilot study. Educational Review, 73(2), 209–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2019.1566210
Yan, L., & Swaran, C. K. (2022). Review of Formative Assessment Practices: Primary Evidence on Relationship with Self-efficacy and Self-esteem. World Journal of English Language, 12(8), 49. https://doi.org/10.5430/WJEL.V12N8P49
Yaşar, M. D. (2020). Chemistry teachers’ assessment literacy in Turkey. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(1), 76–90. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/20.19.76
Zhyhadlo, O. Y. (2022). Application of digital game-based tools for formative assessment at foreign language lessons. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 87(1), 139–150. https://doi.org/10.33407/ITLT.V87I1.4703
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Pensamiento Americano
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Bajo las condiciones siguientes:
-
Reconocimiento — Debe reconocer adecuadamente la autoría, proporcionar un enlace a la licencia e indicar si se han realizado cambios<. Puede hacerlo de cualquier manera razonable, pero no de una manera que sugiera que tiene el apoyo del licenciador o lo recibe por el uso que hace.
-
NoComercial — No puede utilizar el material para una finalidad comercial.
-
SinObraDerivada — Si remezcla, transforma o crea a partir del material, no puede difundir el material modificado.
- No hay restricciones adicionales — No puede aplicar términos legales o medidas tecnológicas que legalmente restrinjan realizar aquello que la licencia permite.
