Revisão das técnicas de avaliação formativa para o fortalecimento das habilidades escritas, orais e práticasna educação
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21803/penamer.18.37.867Palavras-chave:
Aprendizagem ativa, Feedback, Avaliação formativa, Desenvolvimen- to de habilidades, Avaliação dos alunosResumo
Introdução: este estudo analisa as técnicas de avaliação formativa presentes na literatura acadêmica, com foco no desenvolvimento de competências escritas, orais e práticas, bem como nas subcategorias relacionadas aos objetivos de aprendizagem. Objetivo: identificar e categorizar as técnicas de avaliação formativa empregadas no desenvolvimento de competências acadêmicas, complementando a análise com uma abordagem bibliométrica utilizando os pacotes bibliometrix e biblioshiny no R-Studio. Metodologia: foi realizada uma pesquisa nas bases de dados Scopus e WoS. Inicialmente, foram considerados 105 artigos, dos quais 28 estudos foram publicados entre 2018 e 2024 no
âmbito internacional, incluindo a América Latina, os quais foram selecionados após a aplicação dos critérios de inclusão estabelecidos pelo PRISMA. Resultados: é evidente a escassez de estudos em espanhol em comparação com os internacionais. A implementação de técnicas de avaliação formativa ganhou relevância desde a pandemia, destacando-se as avaliações escritas que promovem habilidades como comunicação clara, análise de textos, aplicação correta de regras gramaticais e ortográficas, bem como a melhoria da
argumentação e a adaptação da escrita a diferentes contextos. Conclusões: A avaliação formativa, quando implementada por meio de várias técnicas identificadas na revisão, favorece significativamente o desenvolvimento de competências acadêmicas, permitindo uma categorização útil para futuros processos pedagógicos
Downloads
Referências
Aria, M. & Cuccurullo, C. (2017), Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping análisis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975.
Babinčáková, M., Ganajová, M., Sotáková, I., & Bernard, P. (2020). Influence of formative assessment classroom techniques (Facts) on student’s outcomes in chemistry at secondary school. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(1), 36–49. https://doi.org/10.33225/JBSE/20.19.36
Bennett, R. E. (2011). Formative assessment: A critical review. Assessment in education: principles, policy & practice, 18(1), 5-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2010.513678
Bin Mubayrik, H. F. (2020). New Trends in Formative-Summative Evaluations for Adult Education. SAGE Open, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020941006
Bizarro, W., Sucari, W., & Quispe-Coaquira, A. (2019). Evaluación formativa en el marco del enfoque por competencias. Revista innova educación, 1(3), 374-390. https://revistainnovaeducacion.com/index.php/rie/article/view/45
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11092-008-9068-5/FIGURES/2
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2010). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(1), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171009200119/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/10.1177_003172171009200119-FIG1.JPEG
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2018). Classroom assessment and pedagogy. Assessment in education: Principles, policy & practice, 25(6), 551–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2018.1441807
Bloom, B. (1969). Some theoretical issues relating to educational evaluation. Teachers College Record, 70(10), 26-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146816907001003
Cañadas, Laura. (2020). Formative assessment in university context: opportunities and proposals for action. Revista Digital de Investigación en Docencia Universitaria, 14(2), e1214. https://dx.doi.org/10.19083/ridu.2020.1214
Castejón, F., López, V., Julián, J., & Zaragoza, J. (2011). Evaluación formativa y rendimiento académico en la formación inicial del profesorado de Educación Física. Revista Internacional de Medicina y Ciencias de La Actividad Física y El Deporte, 11(42), 328–346. http://cdeporte.rediris.es/revista/revista42/artevaluacion163.htm
Cusi, A., Schacht, F., Aldon, G., & Swidan, O. (2023). Assessment in mathematics: a study on teachers’ practices in times of pandemic. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 55(1), 221–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11858-022-01395-X/FIGURES/2
Decristan, J., Hondrich, A. L., Büttner, G., Hertel, S., Klieme, E., Kunter, M., ... & Hardy, I. (2015). Impact of additional guidance in science education on primary students’ conceptual understanding. The Journal of Educational Research, 108(5), 358-370. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2014.899957
Den Otter, M. J., Juurlink, L. B. F., & Janssen, F. J. J. M. (2022). How to Assess Students’ Structure-Property Reasoning? Journal of Chemical Education, 99(10), 3396–3405. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACS.JCHEMED.2C00234/SUPPL_FILE/ED2C00234_SI_002.DOCX
Diez, Á., & Domínguez, R. (2018). University Tutors as Facilitators of Student-teachers’ Reflective Learning During their Teaching Practice. Estudios Pedagógicos (Valdivia), 44(2), 311–328. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07052018000200311
Fernández, S. (2017). Evaluación y aprendizaje. MarcoELE: Revista de Didáctica Español Lengua Extranjera, (24), 1-43. https://marcoele.com/evaluacion-y-aprendizaje/
Fernández, M., & Cano, E. (2018). Experiencias de retroacción para mejorar la evaluación continuada: el uso de Twitter como tecnología emergente. Educar, 55(2), 437–455. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/educar.872
Ganajová, M., Sotáková, I., Lukáč, S., Ješková, Z., Jurková, V., & Orosová, R. (2021). Formative assessment as a tool to enhance the development of inquiry skills in science education. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 20(2), 204–222. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/21.20.204
García, F. J., Pozuelos, F. J., & Álvarez, C. (2019). Evaluation of the Learning Students by Novel University Teachers. Formación Universitaria, 12(2), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-50062019000200003
García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2022). Desarrollo de estados de la cuestión robustos: Revisiones Sistemáticas de Literatura. Education in the Knowledge Society (EKS), 23, e28600. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.28600
Gedikli, H., & Buldur, S. (2022). The Effects of Formative Assessment Practices in Science Education on Students’ Metacognitive Knowledge and Regulation Skills *. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 37(4), 1393–1415. https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2022.454
Gikandi, J. W., Morrow, D., & Davis, N. E. (2011). Online formative assessment in higher education: A review of the literature. Computers & education, 57(4), 2333-2351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.004
Gosselin, D. C., & Golick, D. (2020). Posters as an effective assessment tool for a capstone course. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 10(4), 426–437. https://doi.org/10.1007/S13412-020-00612-X/FIGURES/3
Guilding, C., Pye, R. E., Butler, S., Atkinson, M., & Field, E. (2021). Answering questions in a co-created formative exam question bank improves summative exam performance, while students perceive benefits from answering, authoring, and peer discussion: A mixed methods analysis of PeerWise. Pharmacology Research & Perspectives, 9(4), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1002/PRP2.833
Hagos, T., & Andargie, D. (2022). Effects of Technology-Integrated Formative Assessment on Students’ Retention of Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge in Chemical Equilibrium Concepts. Science Education International, 33(4), 383–391. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v33.i4.5
Hamodi, C., Victor, |, López, M., & Teresa López Pastor, A. (2015). Medios, técnicas e instrumentos de evaluación formativa y compartida del aprendizaje en educación superior. Perfiles Educativos, 37(147). https://doi.org/10.22201/IISUE.24486167E.2015.147.47271
Ismail, M. A.-A., Ahmad, A., Mohammad, J. A.-M., Fakri, N. M. R. M., Nor, M. Z. M., & Pa, M. N. M. (2019). Using Kahoot! as a formative assessment tool in medical education: A phenomenological study. BMC Medical Education, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1658-z
Kirkwood, D. L., Bremers, E. K., Robinson, E. A., Brazeal, K. R., & Couch, B. A. (2022). Revisiting Clickers: In-Class Questions Followed by At-Home Reflections Are Associated with Higher Student Performance on Related Exam Questions. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.1128/JMBE.00038-22/SUPPL_FILE/JMBE.00038-22-S0001.PDF
Kokhan, R., Matsevko-Bekerska, L., & Lysanets, Y. (2020). Conversation Analysis Tool as an Effective Means for Teaching the University Courses of English and World Literature. Arab World English Journal, 11(4), 307–318. https://doi.org/10.24093/AWEJ/VOL11NO4.20
Kövecses, V. (2018). Cooperative learning in VR environment. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 15(3), 205–224. https://doi.org/10.12700/APH.15.3.2018.3.12
Kumar, A. B. R. (2022). Study on the Correlation Between the Discrimination Index, Facilitation Value and Distractor Efficiency of a Formative Assessment Useful Tools for OBE Practices. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 36(2), 46–54. https://doi.org/10.16920/JEET/2022/V36I2/22153
Meir, E., Wendel, D., Pope, D. S., Hsiao, L., Chen, D., & Kim, K. J. (2019). Are intermediate constraint question formats useful for evaluating student thinking and promoting learning in formative assessments? Computers & Education, 141, 103606. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2019.103606
Ogange, B. O., Agak, J. O., Okelo, K. O., & Kiprotich, P. (2018). Student Perceptions of the Effectiveness of Formative Assessment in an Online Learning Environment. Open Praxis, 10(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.5944/OPENPRAXIS.10.1.705
Otero, F., Vázquez, F., Cenizo, J. & González, J. (2021). Analysis of the assessment in Physical Education curricula in Primary Education”, Sport, Education and Society, 26(8), 903–916.
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJ.N71
Paré, G., Trudel, M. C., Jaana, M., & Kitsiou, S. (2015). Synthesizing information systems knowledge: a typology of literature reviews. Information & Management, 52(2), 183-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014. 08.008
Pino, M., Enrique, J., Carbó, J., & González, M. (2017). La evaluación formativa en el proceso enseñanza aprendizaje. EDUMECENTRO, 9(3), 263–283.
Rodríguez-Gómez, G., & Ibarra-Sáiz, M. S. (2011). e-Evaluación orientada al e-Aprendizaje estratégico en Educación Superior. Narcea.
Scriven, M. (1967). The Methodology of Evaluation. EE.UU., Rand McNally.
Somers, R., Cunningham-Nelson, S., & Boles, W. (2021). Applying natural language processing to automatically assess student conceptual understanding from textual responses. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 37(5), 98–115. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7121
Srivastava, T., Mishra, V., & Lalitbhushan, W. (2018). Formative Assessment Classroom Techniques (FACTs) for Better Learning in Pre-clinical Medical Education: A Controlled Trial. In jf (Vol. 12, Issue 9, pp. JC01–JC08).
Sri Vinodhini, H., Julius Fusic, S., & Bhagyalakshmi, P. (2020). A Smart Board Approach in Teaching Engineering Mathematics Course. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 34(Special Issue), 271–276. https://doi.org/10.16920/JEET/2021/V34I0/157154
Susithra, N., Deepa, M., Reba, P., & Santhanamari, G. (2022). Coalescing Mind Maps as a Learning Aid cum Formative Assessment Tool for Effective Teaching and Learning of Computer Architecture and Organization Course. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 36(Special Issue 2), 236–243. https://doi.org/10.16920/JEET/2023/V36IS2/23034
Syarifudin, Z., & Suharjito, S. (2020). Mobile based for basic English learning assessment with augmented reality. Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems, 5(2), 774–780. https://doi.org/10.25046/AJ050297
Vishwanathan, K., Joshi, A. N., & Patel, M. J. (2022). Perception of Medical Undergraduate Students about an Electronic Practical Examination in Orthopaedics During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 56(4), 689–698. https://doi.org/10.1007/S43465-021-00578-0/TABLES/4
Wallin, P., & Adawi, T. (2017). The reflective diary as a method for the formative assessment of self-regulated learning. European Journal of Engineering Education, 43(4), 507-521. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2017.1290585
Webb, M., Prasse, D., Phillips, M., Kadijevich, D., Angeli, C., Strijker, A., Carvalho, A., Andresen, B., Dobozy, E. & Laugesen, H. (2018). Challenges for IT-Enabled Formative Assessment of Complex 21st Century Skills, Technology Knowledge and Learning, 23(3), 441–456.
Whittard, D., Green, E., Shareef, M. S., & Ismail, I. (2022). The Multidimensional Model of the One-Minute Paper: Advancing theory through theoretical elaboration. International Review of Economics Education, 41, 100248. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IREE.2022.100248
Williams, K., & Williams, H. (2021). Mathematics problem-solving homework as a conduit for parental involvement in learning. Evaluation of a pilot study. Educational Review, 73(2), 209–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2019.1566210
Yan, L., & Swaran, C. K. (2022). Review of Formative Assessment Practices: Primary Evidence on Relationship with Self-efficacy and Self-esteem. World Journal of English Language, 12(8), 49. https://doi.org/10.5430/WJEL.V12N8P49
Yaşar, M. D. (2020). Chemistry teachers’ assessment literacy in Turkey. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(1), 76–90. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/20.19.76
Zhyhadlo, O. Y. (2022). Application of digital game-based tools for formative assessment at foreign language lessons. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 87(1), 139–150. https://doi.org/10.33407/ITLT.V87I1.4703
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2025 Pensamiento Americano
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The author or authors of an article accepted for publication in the Journal Pensamiento Americano will transfer all of the patrimonial rights to the American University Corporation free of charge, within which are included: the right to edit, publish, reproduce and distribute both print media as digital, in addition to include in article in international indexes and / or databases, likewise, the Editorial Seal is authorized to use the images, tables and / or any graphic material presented in the article for the design of covers or posters from the same magazine. By assuming the patrimonial rights of the article, it may not be partially or totally reproduced in any printed or digital media without its express permission.
AUTHORITY ASPECTS
For the Pensamiento Americano Journal, all the authors of an article have made substantial contributions to the research and the manuscript, and they share the responsibility when the article presents errors, fraud in some way or violations of copyright.
After submitting an article, the journal does not accept the addition, deletion or change in the order of the authors, in addition we reserve the right to release the article when it has been submitted to the journal and under no circumstances will American Thought accept the article. withdrawal of an article during any phase of the editorial process
