LA EXTRAN?A IDEA DEL DESARROLLO. GENEALOGI?A DE UN CONCEPTO
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21803/pensam.v10i18.50Palavras-chave:
Historia de la economía; filosofía de la economía; capitalismo; economía políticaResumo
Este arti?culo elabora una genealogi?a del concepto de desarrollo. Formulado originalmente por R. Prebisch (1950), el concepto sufre varias traducciones, extensiones y modi caciones que terminan asimila?ndolo a una idea perfectamente distinta. El sentido y el contexto originarios terminan transforma?ndose. Asi?, el desarrollo termina siendo una apologi?a del capitalismo. Despue?s de una introduccio?n histo?rica y cienti? ca, el arti?culo desarrolla cuatro argumentos, asi?: el modelo de desarrollo es una idea extran?a; esta idea se ve ampliada y extendida en te?rminos de sostenibilidad; varias cri?ticas, sin embargo, emergen y se hacen necesarias; consiguientemente, se hace posible e imperativo un modelo alternativo al desarrollo. Cada una de las secciones mencionadas son justi cadas en cada paso. Al nal se extraen algunas conclusiones, y el arti?culo termina con una idea fuerte que vincula bancarizacio?n y control ciudadano.
Palabras clave: Historia de la economi?a, Filosofi?a de la economi?a, Capitalismo, Economi?a poli?tica.
Abstract
is paper carries out a genealogy of the concept of development. Originally started out by R. Prebisch (1950), the concept suffers a number of translations, extension, and changes that end up with a quite different idea than it was originally thought. Both the meaning and framework end up being radically changed. us, development ends as an apology to capitalism. An era short historical and philosophical introduction, this paper develops four arguments, as follows: the model of economic development is a weird idea; such an idea is both extended and widened in terms of sustainability; a number of critiques merge, though, that are necessary and feasible; there er, an alternative model of development becomes at the same time possible and compulsory. Each one of the mentioned paragraphs is justified in due time. At the end, some conclusions are drawn, and the paper ends with a string idea that links banking and citizen control.
Keywords: History of Economics, Philosophy of economics, Capitalism, Political economy.
Resumo
Este artigo desenvolve uma genealogia do conceito de desenvolvimento. Originalmente formulado por R. Prebisch (1950), o conceito sofreu va?rias traduc?o?es, extenso?es e modi cac?o?es que acabam compreendendo-o como uma ideia diferente.
O sentido e o contexto origina?rio acabam se transformando. Assim, o desenvolvimento acaba por ser uma apologia do capitalismo. Depois de uma introduc?a?o histo?rica e cienti?fica, o artigo desenvolve quatro argumentos: o modelo de desenvolvimento e? uma ideia estranha; esta ideia e? ampliada e aumentada em termos de sustentabilidade; va?rios comenta?rios, no entanto, emergem e se tornam necessa?rios; consequentemente, tornase possi?vel e imperativo um modelo de desenvolvimento alternativo. Cada uma das sec?o?es mencionadas e? justi cada em cada passo. Ao nal algumas concluso?es sa?o feitas, e o artigo termina com uma ideia forte que liga a bancarizac?a?o e o controle do cidada?o.
Palavras-chave: Histo?ria da economia, Filosofia da economia, Capitalismo, Economia poli?tica.
Downloads
Referências
Arendt, H., (2005). La condición humana. Barcelona: Paidós
Arnsperger, Ch., (2011). L’homme éconmique et le sens de la vie. Petit traité d’alter-économie. Paris: Textuel
Arsel, M., Dasgupta, A., (2015). “Critique, rediscovery and revival in developmental studies”, en: Development and Change, 46(4), 644-665
Carpintero, O., (2006). La bioeconomía de Georgescu-Roegen. Madrid: Montesinos
Fitoussi, J.-P., Laurant, E., (2008). La nueva ecología política. Economía y desarrollo humano. Buenos Aires: Capital Intelectual
Georgescu-Roegen, N., (1996). La ley de la entropía y el proceso económico. Madrid: Argentaria
Klein, N., (2007). e Schock Doctrine: e Rise of Disaster Capitalism. Knopf Canada
Klein, N., (2014). is Changes Everything: Capitalism vs the Climate. Simon & Schuster
Latouche, S., (2006). La apuesta por el decrecimiento. ¿Cómo salir del imaginario dominante? Barcelona: Icaria
Latouche, S., (2009). Pequeño tratado del decrecimiento económico. Barcelona: Icaria
Latour, B., Lépinay, V. A., (2009). La economía, ciencia de los intereses apasionados. Introducción a la antropología económica. Buenos Aires: Manantial
Maldonado, C. E., (2014). “Biodesarrollo y complejidad. Propuesta de un modelo teórico”, en: Un viaje por las alternativas al desarrollo. Perspectivas y propuestas teóricas, C. E. Maldonado y M. L. Eschenhaguen (Eds.). Bogotá-Medellín: Ed. Universidad del Rosario-Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana; pp. 71-96
Ormerod, P., (1995). Por una nueva economía. Las falacias de las ciencias económicas. Barcelona: Anagrama
Ormerod, P., (1997). e Death of Economics. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Ossola, C., (2011). En pure perte. Le renonce- ment et le gratuit. Paris: Rivage
Passet, R., (1996). Principios de bioeconomía. Madrid: Argentaria
Peet, R., (2009). e Unholy Trinity: e IMF, World Bank, and WTO. Zed Books
Perry, W. T., (2016). “Development and dis- trust: A critique of the orthodox path to economic prosperity”, en: Northwestern University Law Review, vol. 110, No. 2, pp. 477-506
Prebish, R., (1950). e Economic Development of Latin America and its Principal Problems. New York: United Nations
Sartea, C., (2014). “El derecho al desarrollo: una cuestión de justicia y solidaridad”, en: Dikaion, Año 28, vol. 23, No. 2 (Diciembre), pp. 327-349
Schneider, G., Nega, B., (2016). “Limits of the new institutional economics approach to African development, en: Journal of Economic Issues, vol. L, No. 2 (Junio), pp. 435-443
Taibo, C., (2010). Su crisis y la nuestra. Un paneto sobre decrecimiento, tragedias y farsas. Madrid: Catarata
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2017 Pensamiento Americano
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The author or authors of an article accepted for publication in the Journal Pensamiento Americano will transfer all of the patrimonial rights to the American University Corporation free of charge, within which are included: the right to edit, publish, reproduce and distribute both print media as digital, in addition to include in article in international indexes and / or databases, likewise, the Editorial Seal is authorized to use the images, tables and / or any graphic material presented in the article for the design of covers or posters from the same magazine. By assuming the patrimonial rights of the article, it may not be partially or totally reproduced in any printed or digital media without its express permission.
AUTHORITY ASPECTS
For the Pensamiento Americano Journal, all the authors of an article have made substantial contributions to the research and the manuscript, and they share the responsibility when the article presents errors, fraud in some way or violations of copyright.
After submitting an article, the journal does not accept the addition, deletion or change in the order of the authors, in addition we reserve the right to release the article when it has been submitted to the journal and under no circumstances will American Thought accept the article. withdrawal of an article during any phase of the editorial process
